🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and shared recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president asserting the sites had been eliminated. Following this, Western states employed their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in some form if discussions reopen.

The US president last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi said the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He said the assaults started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to enforce their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and stays the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the identical tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this attack."